What the work involves

You'll spend most sessions reading and grading — model-generated answers to bankruptcy questions, checked against current Title 11 practice, local rules, and the realities of how a case actually moves through a bankruptcy court. When an answer is wrong, the deliverable isn't a score; it's a written explanation of why it's wrong and what the correct analysis looks like, with citations a reviewer can verify. Other tasks rotate through drafting exercises: a sample motion for relief from stay, an objection to claim, a plan confirmation brief, a §363 sale motion — written to reflect both routine filings and the messier fact patterns that don't resolve cleanly.

  • Annotate and comment on bankruptcy documents: petitions, schedules, plans, adversary complaints, proofs of claim
  • Draft representative motions, pleadings, and filings with reasoning notes
  • Evaluate hypotheticals and write out the argumentation, including counterarguments
  • Flag where a model states law confidently but wrongly — preference disputes, exemption planning, discharge exceptions, chapter-specific quirks
  • Note circuit splits and unsettled areas rather than papering over them

What the platform screens for

micro1 runs an AI-led interview before human review. It is looking for verifiable practice detail: which chapters you've worked in, whether you've appeared in court, what side of the table you sat on (debtor, creditor, trustee, committee). Expect follow-ups that press one step past your first answer — a general statement about automatic stay relief will get met with a request for the specific standard and how you'd argue it. Consumer-only and business-only backgrounds are both viable; the screen cares that you name your lane accurately. No AI or annotation experience is expected or asked about. Preferred but not required: a bankruptcy or federal clerkship, law teaching, or law review editorial work — all signal comfort writing for an audience that will scrutinize you.

Logistics

Fully remote, contractor engagement, fully asynchronous aside from occasional calibration calls. Most contributors work 10–20 hours a week around active practice, choosing their own hours; some projects offer more volume in bursts. Pay in the $90–150/hr range has been observed on comparable micro1 legal projects, set by experience depth and task type — not guaranteed, and project duration varies with client demand. An active U.S. license in good standing is a hard requirement.