The work
This is hands-on annotation, not model critique. You'll work through queues of audio and video samples — applying labels, marking timestamps or segments, transcribing or verifying spoken content, and flagging samples that don't fit the taxonomy. A second stream of work is review: checking annotations others have already produced, resolving disagreements, and correcting inconsistencies before batches ship.
Guidelines change. A meaningful part of the job is reading updated instruction documents carefully, understanding why a rule changed, and re-applying it consistently across old and new work. You're also expected to document your reasoning on ambiguous cases so a project lead can audit the decision later, and to surface edge cases the guidelines don't cover instead of guessing silently.
What the screen looks for
- Guideline literalism under pressure — can you follow a rule as written even when your instinct disagrees, and raise the disagreement through the right channel?
- Consistency across volume. Screens often present near-identical samples to see whether you label them the same way.
- English comprehension for audio — accents, overlapping speech, poor recording quality.
- Honest ambiguity handling. Flagging a genuinely unclear sample scores better than a confident wrong label.
- Prior exposure to labeling tools (CVAT, Label Studio, Audacity, or platform-native tools) helps but isn't required.
Logistics
Contractor engagement, fully remote, async. Work is pulled from queues rather than scheduled, so hours are flexible, but projects run in bursts — heavy weeks followed by gaps. Pay in the $6–8/hr band has been observed for this listing; micro1 sets rates by project and region, and neither the rate nor ongoing volume is guaranteed. Expect a stable internet connection, quality headphones for audio tasks, and a desktop or laptop as baseline requirements.