What the work involves
You author exam-grade multiple-choice questions inside your EE specialization — analog, digital, RF, or power electronics, generally with an integrated-circuit slant. Each item needs one defensibly correct option, distractors that reflect real misconceptions rather than filler, a concise worked explanation, and a rubric a second reviewer can apply without guessing your intent. The other half of the work is adjudication: reading model output on EE topics and deciding whether it is correct, subtly wrong, or right for the wrong reason, then documenting why in language a non-specialist reviewer can follow.
Expect iteration. Questions get returned for ambiguity, for options that are technically defensible under a different assumption, or for topics that have drifted too close to textbook recall. Engineers who do well here treat rejection notes as spec clarifications rather than disputes.
What the platform screens for
- Verifiable depth in one named subdomain. Screens push past definitions — expect follow-ups on tradeoffs, corner cases, and what breaks at the boundaries of a stated assumption.
- Item-writing judgment. Can you explain why a distractor is plausible, and why a question has exactly one correct answer under the stated conditions?
- Clarity under constraint. Explanations are graded on precision and brevity, not length.
- Follow-through. micro1 fills these roles quickly and expects first tasks within 24–48 hours of onboarding.
Logistics
Fully remote and asynchronous — no standing meetings, no fixed hours. Compensation is output-based: you are paid per task meeting spec, and the observed $60–80/hr band reflects experienced contributors working at pace, not a guaranteed hourly rate. Minimum weekly submission quotas apply, so treat this as a recurring commitment rather than occasional side work. Advanced degrees (MS/PhD) are preferred, and prior teaching, tutoring, or assessment-writing experience is a strong differentiator. No AI background required.