What the work involves
You are asked to act as the senior legal reviewer a model does not have. Tasks arrive as discrete units: a model drafts a mutual NDA, summarizes indemnification exposure in a master services agreement, answers a question about board minute practice, or advises a hypothetical founder on contractor-versus-employee classification. Your job is to judge whether the output would survive contact with a real client — and to say precisely where it fails.
Day-to-day this looks like:
- Rating two or more candidate responses against a rubric and writing a short rationale that a non-lawyer reviewer can follow
- Rewriting flawed answers into a reference version, including the caveats and jurisdictional qualifiers a competent GC would add
- Flagging confident-but-wrong output: invented case names, stale statutory thresholds, advice that ignores privilege, conflicts, or unauthorized-practice limits
- Authoring new prompts drawn from problems you have actually handled — a difficult assignment clause, a whistleblower complaint, a data processing addendum negotiation
What the platform screens for
micro1 runs an AI-led interview before any human review. It probes for verifiable specifics: where you practiced, what you owned, deal or matter types, headcount and revenue scale of the companies you advised. Expect follow-ups that go one layer deeper than your first answer — if you mention negotiating a commercial agreement, be ready to name the clause you fought over and the fallback you accepted. Generalist breadth is valued here more than one narrow specialty, since GC review tasks range from equity administration to privacy to employment. A bar license in good standing and demonstrable in-house or senior-firm experience are effectively prerequisites.
Logistics
Fully remote and asynchronous. Assignments are posted in batches with deadlines measured in days, not hours, and you choose your volume. Most reviewers report 5–15 hours weekly, though throughput matters: consistent quality and turnaround drive both continued access and rate movement within the observed $100–200/hr band. Pay is per hour of logged review time or per task depending on the project. Conflicts screening applies, and you should assume you cannot use privileged material from current or former clients as source material for prompts.