What the work involves
You receive batches of prompts — scripted sentences, wordlists, conversational scenarios, or open-ended topics — and record yourself speaking them in Italian. Some batches target clean read speech; others deliberately ask for natural, unpolished delivery: hesitations, self-corrections, overlapping register shifts, regional pronunciation. You may also be asked to record at varying distances from the microphone, at different speaking rates, or in specified acoustic conditions.
A second stream of work is quality review: listening to other contributors' recordings and flagging clipping, background noise, mispronunciation, script deviation, or wrong-language segments. Some projects add light transcription or orthographic correction of what was actually said versus what was scripted.
What the platform screens for
- Native or near-native Italian. Screeners probe for natural prosody and comfort with idiomatic phrasing, not textbook fluency. Regional accents are usually welcome and sometimes specifically recruited.
- A usable recording setup. A quiet room, a decent USB or XLR microphone, and the ability to produce clean WAV files at the requested sample rate. Laptop built-in mics are typically rejected.
- Instruction discipline. Most rejected submissions fail on a specification detail — wrong format, wrong file naming, a prompt read approximately rather than exactly — not on voice quality.
- Consistency across a batch. Recording levels and mic distance need to hold steady across dozens of files.
Logistics
Fully remote and asynchronous. Work arrives in batches with deadlines rather than fixed shifts, so hours are self-scheduled; contributors commonly report 5–20 hours a week depending on project volume. Pay observed in the $20–40/hr range, varying with task complexity, whether review or transcription is bundled in, and any scarcity of the requested dialect or demographic profile. Volume is project-driven and can pause between campaigns.