Korean Transcription Expert

$15–28/hrrate as listed

Transcribe and quality-check Korean audio — including code-switched Korean-English speech — to spec for an AI training dataset, then annotate files with contextual metadata. Contract work through micro1, fully remote and asynchronous, with observed rates of $24–35/hr.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.

What the work involves

You receive batches of Korean audio and produce verbatim or lightly cleaned transcripts according to a written style guide that will change as the project matures. Most files contain natural, unscripted speech: overlapping speakers, dialect and regional pronunciation, filler and hesitation, background noise, and frequent code-switching into English. A second stream of work is review — auditing other contributors' transcripts against the audio, correcting errors, and flagging systematic problems rather than silently patching them.

Alongside the transcript itself, you add metadata and contextual notes: speaker turns, inaudible spans, non-speech events, register or dialect observations, anything that helps a model learn the difference between what was said and what was meant. Coordinators expect you to ask questions when the guide is ambiguous, and to document your reasoning when you make a judgment call.

What the platform screens for

Verifiable Korean depth. Native or near-native fluency, with confident handling of spoken registers — honorific levels, casual speech, regional variation — not just standard written Korean.
Transcription discipline. Prior paid transcription work, ideally where accuracy was audited. Expect questions about your typing throughput, your timestamping habits, and how you treat disfluencies.
Guideline literalism. The most common failure is a transcriber who "improves" the speech. Screens probe whether you can follow a convention you personally disagree with, and raise the disagreement through the right channel.
Written English. You'll be documenting ambiguities and giving process feedback in English.

Logistics

Remote, contractor, asynchronous. Work is delivered in batches against deadlines rather than fixed shifts, so you set your own hours — but batches are throughput-sensitive, and consistent weekly availability matters more than a large one-off burst. Pay is stated as observed for this listing, not guaranteed; rate and volume typically depend on whether you're doing first-pass transcription or review. No AI background is required.

What they look for

Audio Transcription
Attention to detail
AI training

Before you apply

Would you pass this screen?

Drawn from what this listing actually requires. Answered in your browser — nothing is sent to us, and we do not store your answers.

Do you have native or near-native fluency in Korean, with professional experience working in Korean across at least three years?
Korean language proficiency · required
Have you completed at least 20 hours of professional audio transcription work (in any language) where accuracy and consistency were explicitly required?
Audio transcription experience · required
Are you proficient in written and spoken English well enough to communicate clearly with project coordinators and document transcription findings?
English proficiency · required
Have you used at least one industry-standard transcription platform or tool (such as Otter, Express Scribe, Audacity, or similar) in a professional context?
Transcription tools familiarity · preferred

0 of 4 answered

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 12 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: Establishing baseline fluency level and whether the candidate has sustained professional exposure to Korean, not just conversational ability.
A strong answer: Name specific years of professional Korean work (translation, interpretation, teaching, customer service, etc.), describe the fluency level achieved, and indicate whether you've handled technical or specialized vocabulary beyond everyday speech.
Where people lose it: Claiming native fluency without specifying professional history, or conflating personal/heritage Korean with professional-grade command of both written and spoken Korean across varied contexts.