What the work involves
You receive a commercial dispute scenario — an LLC deadlock, a minority oppression claim, a breach of fiduciary duty against a managing member, a buyout valuation fight — and produce the work product a supervising partner would expect: a motion to dismiss, a brief in opposition, a demand letter, interrogatories and requests for production, or a case-theory memo. Scenarios evolve across multiple turns, so you are expected to keep strategy coherent as new facts land rather than restarting each time. Alongside the drafting, you write rubric criteria: an explicit account of what separates a strong response from a mediocre one at that procedural stage, which is what actually teaches the model. All materials are public or synthetic; you never touch client files.
What the platform screens for
micro1's screen is AI-led and moves quickly. It confirms bar admission and post-JD litigation years, then probes shareholder/LLC substance — the difference between direct and derivative claims, demand futility, the business judgment rule as applied to closely held entities, statutory dissolution and oppression standards, operating agreement drafting that alters default fiduciary duties. Expect follow-ups that press on jurisdictional variation (Delaware versus your home state) rather than accepting a general answer. It also tests evaluation judgment: whether you can articulate why one brief beats another in specific terms, and whether you flag missing facts and procedural defects instead of writing around them.
Logistics
- Remote, US-based contractor engagement; asynchronous, no fixed shifts.
- Observed pay band of $100–150/hr, set by experience and specialization — not guaranteed.
- Roles are typically filled within 48 hours; first tasks expected 24–48 hours after onboarding.
- Contributors commonly work in blocks of a few hours; sustained weekly availability matters more than a large one-time commitment.
No AI experience is required. The scarce input is a litigator who can draft cleanly under senior direction and explain, in writing, what made the draft good.