What the work involves

You write single-choice questions grounded in real mechanical engineering problems, then document why the correct answer is correct and why each distractor fails. The subject areas are narrow by design: Solid & Structural Mechanics, Dynamics/Vibration/Control, or Thermal-Fluids. Good items are unambiguous, solvable from stated assumptions, and hard for a strong model to guess — which usually means distractors that encode specific, plausible errors (sign conventions, wrong boundary conditions, a dropped factor from a non-dimensional group) rather than random numbers.

Expect a loop rather than one-way submission. Coordinators or reviewers return items with feedback on ambiguity, unit consistency, or insufficient rationale, and you revise. You track assignments and submissions in whatever tooling the project provides. No prior AI or ML experience is expected; the value you bring is the ability to be right about engineering and to explain why in writing.

What the screen looks for

micro1's process is AI-led and moves fast — the listing states roles are typically filled within 48 hours and first tasks begin 24–48 hours after onboarding. Screens on this platform tend to probe:

  • Verifiable specifics about your degree, specialization, and the problems you actually solved
  • Domain depth under follow-up — a first answer is rarely the end of the exchange
  • Whether you can spot a flawed question and say precisely what's wrong with it
  • Honest availability against a weekly minimum

Logistics and pay

Fully remote and asynchronous, with milestone-based delivery rather than fixed hours. Compensation here is per accepted task, not hourly; the $50–70/hr band is an observed effective rate reported for this category and depends entirely on how quickly you produce items that pass review. Early items are usually slower. Minimum weekly submission volumes apply, so treat this as a real recurring commitment rather than occasional side work.