Moonlight MCQA - Hungarian Law

$31–38/hrrate as listed

Write original exam-style multiple-choice questions on Hungarian law, each with ten answer options and a written solution, for use in an AI evaluation dataset. Work is remote and self-scheduled, with observed pay in the $30.87–37.73/hr range.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.

The work

You draft multiple-choice questions from your own knowledge of Hungarian law — no scraping bar-exam banks, no rewording published items. Each item needs a clear stem, ten answer options, exactly one defensible correct answer, and a worked solution that explains why the key is right and why the strongest distractors fail. The point is to produce questions a competent Hungarian lawyer would answer correctly and a language model plausibly would not, which means distractors have to be genuinely tempting rather than obviously wrong.

Expect to cover whichever areas you actually practise in: Ptk. obligations and property, Btk. and criminal procedure, labour law, public administration and constitutional questions, company and insolvency law, or EU law as it applies domestically. Citing the operative statute, section, or relevant Kúria decision is normally part of the solution. Reviewers send items back for ambiguity, two arguably correct options, or reasoning that restates the answer instead of justifying it, so budget time for revision passes.

What the screen looks for

Verifiable credentials: a Hungarian law degree (or recognised equivalent) and, ideally, two or more years in practice.
Native-level Hungarian and grounding in Hungarian legal education or practice — comparative or foreign-trained backgrounds without Hungarian domestic depth generally do not pass.
Depth under follow-up: the interview will push past a first answer to see whether you can locate a rule in the code and explain how it applies to facts.
Evaluation judgment: whether you can tell a hard question from a merely obscure one, and whether you can articulate why a distractor is plausible.

Logistics

Fully remote and asynchronous. Contributors typically commit somewhere between 10 and 20 hours a week against a throughput target rather than fixed shifts, and work is paid hourly at the observed band above — rates vary by assessed expertise and are set by the platform, not guaranteed. Projects of this type run in batches, so expect finite duration with possible renewal.

What they look for

Hungarian law degree (JD/JM) or recognised equivalent
Native-level Hungarian
2+ years practising Hungarian law (preferred)
Educated or currently based in Hungary
Ability to draft and cite from primary sources (Ptk., Btk., Kúria case law)
Clear written legal reasoning in question-and-solution format

Before you apply

Would you pass this screen?

Drawn from what this listing actually requires. Answered in your browser — nothing is sent to us, and we do not store your answers.

Do you hold a law degree (LL.B., Dr. jur., or equivalent Hungarian legal qualification) from an accredited institution?
Law degree or Hungarian equivalent · required
Have you worked actively in Hungarian law practice, in-house counsel, judicial, or academic roles for at least 2 years?
2+ years Hungarian law experience · preferred
Are you a native Hungarian speaker, or have you worked as a legal professional in Hungarian?
Native or fluent Hungarian · required
Were you educated in Hungary, or are you currently based in Hungary?
Educated or based in Hungary · preferred

0 of 4 answered

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 11 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: Whether you have real professional depth in Hungarian law, not just textbook knowledge—you need to know the common mistakes practitioners and students actually make, not invented distractors.
A strong answer: Name a concrete area (e.g., employment termination under the Labour Code, property succession, or company formation) with a specific case or transaction, describing the legal framework and at least one substantive pitfall you've encountered or observed.
Where people lose it: Describing only general knowledge ('I studied Hungarian law') without a specific matter, or naming a domain but offering no detail—screeners test whether you can generate authentic wrong answers from real experience, not whether you pass a bar exam.