The work

You draft exam-style multiple-choice questions in Norwegian, drawn from your own academic and professional knowledge rather than from copied source material. Each item needs a clear stem, ten answer options where the distractors are plausible enough to be tempting but defensibly wrong, one unambiguously correct answer, and a worked solution that explains the reasoning a competent person would follow. The intent is to produce questions that a strong language model might actually get wrong — so items that reward surface pattern-matching or that can be answered by recognising a keyword tend to get sent back.

Subject matter is generalist: history, science, civics, literature, geography, everyday reasoning, and Norwegian-specific knowledge are all in scope. Volume expectations and rubrics come from the platform, and reviewers give feedback on early batches before you scale up.

What the screening looks for

  • Verifiable credentials: a master's or PhD, and 2–6 years of professional experience you can describe concretely.
  • Education in Norway or current residence there, plus native-level Norwegian — including comfort with formal register and academic vocabulary.
  • Item-writing judgment: whether you can explain why a distractor is good, and spot ambiguity in your own stems.
  • Willingness to write from scratch. Plagiarised or lightly-reworded exam questions are the most common disqualifier.

Logistics

Fully remote and asynchronous. Hours are flexible with no fixed shifts; most contributors treat this as part-time alongside other work. Pay is hourly within the observed band above — bands shift by project and are not guaranteed. Expect an onboarding batch that is reviewed before ongoing work is assigned.