Moonlight MCQA - Norwegian Law

$49–59/hrrate as listed

Write original exam-style multiple-choice questions on Norwegian law, each with ten answer options and a worked solution, for use in an AI evaluation dataset. Work is remote and asynchronous, with observed pay between $48.51 and $59.29/hr.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.

The work

You draft multiple-choice questions from your own knowledge of Norwegian law — no scraping bar exams, no rewording textbook items. Each question carries ten answer options rather than the usual four, which means eight or nine plausible distractors that a strong model might actually pick: near-miss statutory provisions, the rule as it stood before an amendment, the rule from a neighbouring Nordic jurisdiction, the correct outcome with the wrong legal basis. You then write a worked solution that traces the reasoning to its source, whether that is a lov, a forskrift, Høyesterett case law, or EEA-derived obligations.

Most contributors work in one or two areas they genuinely practise — kontraktsrett, forvaltningsrett, strafferett, arbeidsrett, selskapsrett, tingsrett — rather than spreading across the whole curriculum. Items are reviewed, and the common reasons for rejection are ambiguity between two defensible answers, distractors that are trivially wrong, and citations that do not support the stated conclusion. Expect revision requests and treat them as part of the job.

What the screen looks for

A verifiable Norwegian law degree (master i rettsvitenskap or recognised equivalent) and, preferably, two or more years in practice
Native-level Norwegian, since questions and solutions are written in Norwegian and legal register matters
Evidence that you can name the controlling authority for a proposition without looking it up, and defend it under follow-up
Judgment about difficulty calibration: can you explain why one distractor is tempting and another is filler?

Logistics

Fully remote, asynchronous, no fixed hours. Contributors typically commit somewhere between 10 and 20 hours a week, though the platform's needs shift by legal area and cohorts open and close. Pay in the $48.51–59.29/hr range has been observed for this listing; actual rates depend on the platform's assessment and are not guaranteed. Work is contract-based via Mercor.

What they look for

Norwegian law degree (master i rettsvitenskap) or recognised equivalent
Native-level written Norwegian
2+ years practising Norwegian law (preferred)
Command of Norwegian statutory sources, forskrifter, and Høyesterett case law
Exam-style question writing and clear legal reasoning in writing
Educated or currently based in Norway

Before you apply

Would you pass this screen?

Drawn from what this listing actually requires. Answered in your browser — nothing is sent to us, and we do not store your answers.

Do you hold a law degree (Cand. jur., Juris Doctor, or equivalent qualification in law) from an accredited institution?
Law degree or equivalent · required
Were you educated in Norwegian law or have you practised law in Norway for at least one year?
Norwegian legal education or practice · required
Is Norwegian your native language or have you lived and worked professionally in Norway for at least five consecutive years?
Native-level Norwegian · required
Are you currently based in Norway, or do you have active professional access to Norwegian legal colleagues, databases, or courts?
Current Norway connection · preferred
Do you have at least two years of practising experience after qualifying as a lawyer (including in-house roles, government, academic positions, or private practice)?
2+ years post-qualification · preferred

0 of 5 answered

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 12 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: Whether you have lived experience with the actual complexity and ambiguity of Norwegian law practice, not just textbook knowledge—the kind that lets you write questions that trip up those who only memorized rules.
A strong answer: You name a concrete scenario (client advice, court case, regulatory matter) where you encountered a gap between what the statute says and how it's applied, showing you understand friction points in the system that make for good assessment questions.
Where people lose it: Describing a generic legal concept (like 'contract law') rather than a specific situation where you discovered Norwegian law's real interpretive challenges; or claiming broad expertise without anchoring it to work you've actually done.