Moonlight MCQA - Swedish Law

$39–47/hrrate as listed

Write original exam-style multiple-choice questions on Swedish law — ten answer options each, plus a worked solution — for use in an AI evaluation dataset. Fully remote and asynchronous, with work claimed in batches rather than assigned by shift.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.

The work

You draft questions from your own practice knowledge, not from copied bar exam banks or textbook exercises. Each item is a self-contained legal problem — a fact pattern, a statutory or procedural question, a doctrinal distinction — followed by ten answer options and a written solution that explains why the correct option holds and, where it matters, why the near-misses fail. The ten-option format is deliberate: it removes the guessing floor and forces distractors that are genuinely plausible to a trained lawyer. Most of the difficulty in this role sits in distractor construction, not in the question stem.

Subject coverage typically spans the areas a Swedish practitioner would recognise from their own docket: avtalsrätt, köprätt, skadeståndsrätt, associationsrätt, arbetsrätt, förvaltningsrätt, straffrätt and processrätt, with attention to correct citation of relevant kapitel and paragrafer in the applicable balk or lag. Questions must be answerable from Swedish law as it currently stands, with EU-law interaction flagged where it is dispositive.

What the screen looks for

A verifiable juristexamen or equivalent, and a credible account of where and how you have practised
Genuine depth under follow-up — reviewers probe a claimed specialism until the answers either hold up or thin out
Native-level written Swedish, plus enough English to work with reviewer feedback and specification documents
Calibration judgment: can you tell a hard question from a merely obscure one, and an ambiguous item from a rigorous one

Logistics and pay

Remote and asynchronous; there are no fixed hours and no meetings in the ordinary course. Contributors report observed rates in the $38.59–47.17/hr range on this project — a band, not a guarantee, and actual assignment depends on the screen outcome and on batch availability at the time you onboard. Volume on Mercor projects fluctuates; treat this as supplementary rather than steady income. Expect a paid or unpaid sample item early on, and expect revision requests on your first batch.

What they look for

Juristexamen or equivalent Swedish law degree
Native-level written Swedish
2+ years in legal practice (litigation, advisory, or judicial)
Educated or currently based in Sweden
Accurate citation of Swedish statutes (balkar, lagar, förarbeten)
Experience writing or grading exam-style assessment items

Before you apply

Would you pass this screen?

Drawn from what this listing actually requires. Answered in your browser — nothing is sent to us, and we do not store your answers.

Do you hold a law degree (juris kandidat, magister, or equivalent professional qualification) from a Swedish or recognised equivalent institution?
Swedish law degree or equivalent · required
Are you a native Swedish speaker, or did you grow up in Sweden and use Swedish as your primary language?
Native-level Swedish · required
Are you either currently based in Sweden, or were you educated in Sweden (secondary school or university level), or do you currently practise Swedish law?
Based in or educated in Sweden · required
Do you have at least two years of professional legal practice experience involving Swedish law (in-house counsel, law firm, government, courts, or equivalent)?
Legal practice experience · preferred

0 of 4 answered

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 13 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: Whether you have genuine hands-on experience applying Swedish law in practice, not just theoretical knowledge from coursework. The specificity and complexity of your example signals depth.
A strong answer: Describe a concrete case or advisory situation where you identified a Swedish legal principle, considered how it applied, and reached a defensible conclusion. Name the relevant statute, court level, or legal concept. Avoid generic or hypothetical scenarios.
Where people lose it: Giving an example so simplified or textbook-sounding that it reads like exam revision rather than lived practice. Or naming the issue without explaining how you actually worked through it.